IEBC Chairman Wafula Chebukati on Thursday morning sent a memo to the electoral body’s CEO Ezra Chiloba with some damning queries over the ‘fraudulent’ August 8 presidential election.
The Chairman wanted Chiloba to ‘explain and respond to 12 questions.’
Read: Ekuru Aukot Moving To Court, Wants To Be Part Of Fresh Polls
- First, you issued a Memo to the Commission’s staff dated 1st September, 2017 referenced IEBC/CEO/1/1/09/2017; in the said Memo you appear to contradict the position adopted by the Commission and communicated by the Chairperson on behalf of the Commission vide a Press Statement on the 1st of September, 2017. Respond and explain the basis for your contradiction;
-
The Commission contracted Messer Al Ghurair, to print the Country’s ballot papers and various statutory forms to be used in the Presidential election; under defined contractual terms and obligations. Respond and explain what happened to the printed forms that were meant to have various approved security features.
-
The Commission had contracted Messer MFI to avail printing and scanning machines across the Country, for the use in the 8th August, 2017 polls. Respond and explain on whether these machines were supplied – fit for purpose – as contracted, and where they were availed and failed to work, explain failure.
Read Also: 4 Commissioners Walk Out Of Chebukati’s Crisis Meeting
- The Commission spent about KES 848 Million to purchase satellite phones: the phones were to be distributed to each constituency and county tallying centre. Additionally areas with no network were specifically supplied with these devices, however none of these ever worked. Respond and explain what occasioned the massive failure in the devices.
Mr Paul Mugo and Mr Boniface Wamae – under instructions from the Director of ICT Mr James Muhati, availed a Memo dated 31st August, 2017, to the Chairman’s office through your office; which Memo confirmed the creation of a username account and password in the name of the Chairperson of IEBC – without my knowledge or consent, and subsequently this account was used to undertake over 9,934 transactions. I direct that you take immediate action against these officers and report back by close of business (CoB) today;
Respond and explain what went wrong with KIEMS results transmission, where over 10,366 out of 40,883 polling stations sent text results without the accompanying Forms 34A. Noting that these polling stations had 4,636,556 voters registered therein.
Respond and avail an explanation as to why 595 polling stations failed and/or otherwise refused to send any results for the presidential election;
Respond explain why the Commission adopted and used a porous file server system to transmit Forms 34B; instead of creating and using a secure IP address: which made it easy for individuals to manage accounts on each other’s behalf – a clear security risk. Further respond and explain why the Commission used the subject server for day to day operations prior to the elections.
Some of the KIEMs kits were assigned Orange and Airtel as their service providers whereas these two [2] operators did not have coverage in those assigned areas: worse still, Safaricom [a contracted operator] had the required coverage for these areas but were not considered. Respond and explain why mapping out was not undertaken and these issues addressed and/or otherwise mitigated.
Read Also: Jubilee Leaders Lash Out At Odinga Over ‘Children Will Not Die If Exams Are Pushed’ Statement
- Additionally respond and explain why the Commission experienced non-validation of individuals/voters after the KIEMS identification, essentially obfuscating the logs on voters cleared per polling station to vote. Respond on how many voters were subsequently allowed to vote by manual identification and why
Further respond and explain why 682 polling stations had an equal number of rejected votes vis-a-vis the number of registered voters in those polling stations; and,
Lastly, respond and explain why KIEMS GPRS and Geo-fencing features were switched off from the 5th August, 2017.
The memo has however been dismissed by five commissioners saying that ‘it was not discussed and sanctioned by commission plenary.’
The commissioners said that they learnt about the said letter through the media.
Do you have a story you want told? Do you know of a sensitive story you would like us to get our hands on? Email your news TIPS to Editor@kahawatungu.com